[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150815001039.GA4885@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:10:39 -0700
From: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Taichi Kageyama <t-kageyama@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"peter@...leysoftware.com" <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jslaby@...e.cz" <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"prarit@...hat.com" <prarit@...hat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
"jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com" <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] serial: 8250: Fix autoconfig_irq() to avoid race
conditions
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:15:40AM +0000, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
> The following race conditions can happen when a serial port is used
> as console.
>
> Case1: CPU_B is used to detect an interrupt from a serial port,
> but it can have interrupts disabled during the waiting time.
> Case2: CPU_B clears UART_IER just after CPU_A sets UART_IER and then
> a serial port may not make an interrupt.
> Case3: CPU_A sets UART_IER just after CPU_B clears UART_IER.
> This is an unexpected behavior for serial8250_console_write().
>
> CPU_A [autoconfig_irq] | CPU_B [serial8250_console_write]
> ----------------------------|---------------------------------------
> |
> probe_irq_on() | spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock,)
> serial_outp(,UART_IER,0x0f) | serial_out(,UART_IER,0)
> udelay(20); | uart_console_write()
> probe_irq_off() |
> | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock,)
>
> Case1 and 2 can make autoconfig_irq() failed.
> In these cases, the console doesn't work in interrupt mode and
> "input overrun" (which can make operation mistakes) can happen
> on some systems. Especially in the Case1, It is known that the
> problem happens with high rate every boot once it occurs
> because the boot sequence is always almost same.
>
> port mutex makes sure that the autoconfig operation is exclusive of
> any other concurrent HW access except by the console operation.
> console lock is required in autoconfig_irq().
>
> Signed-off-by: Taichi Kageyama <t-kageyama@...jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git v4.2-rc4.org/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c v4.2-rc4.work/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> index 37fff12..ed1e23e 100644
> --- v4.2-rc4.org/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> +++ v4.2-rc4.work/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> @@ -1303,6 +1303,9 @@ static void autoconfig_irq(struct uart_8250_port *up)
> inb_p(ICP);
> }
>
> + if (uart_console(port))
> + console_lock();
> +
> /* forget possible initially masked and pending IRQ */
> probe_irq_off(probe_irq_on());
> save_mcr = serial_in(up, UART_MCR);
> @@ -1334,6 +1337,9 @@ static void autoconfig_irq(struct uart_8250_port *up)
> if (port->flags & UPF_FOURPORT)
> outb_p(save_ICP, ICP);
>
> + if (uart_console(port))
> + console_unlock();
> +
> port->irq = (irq > 0) ? irq : 0;
> }
This doesn't apply to my tty-next tree at all. Can you please rebase it
and resend?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists