[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1439715671.3480.21.camel@citrix.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 10:01:11 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@....com>,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] dtb: Create a common home for cross-architecture
dtsi files.
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 16:21 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> +arm-soc
I could've sworn I did the same at one point. Obviously not.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Ian Campbell <
> ian.campbell@...rix.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 17:06 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > Commit 9ccd608070b6 ("arm64: dts: add device tree for ARM SMM
> > > -A53x2 on
> > > LogicTile Express 20MG") added a new dts file to arch/arm64 which
> > > included "../../../../arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi", i.e. a
> > > .dtsi supplied by arch/arm.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately this causes some issues for the split device tree
> > > repository[0], since things get moved around there. In that
> > > context
> > > the new .dts ends up at src/arm64/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7
> > > -ca53x2.dts
> > > while the include is at src/arm/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi.
> >
> > Hi Grant,
> >
> > Do you think there is any chance of getting this into 4.2-rc$NEXT
> > or shall
> > we wait until 4.3? I'm assuming this should go via the DT tree, but
> > maybe
> > it should go via an ARM tree?
>
> I was assuming this would go thru the arm-soc tree which is why I
> acked it. It is getting a bit late for 4.2 at this point, but I guess
> the standalone tree remains broken for these platforms until this is
> done.
Correct.
> Probably not such a big deal in grand scheme of things.
I guess not. FWIW I've not pushed since the breakage started happening,
so the split tree isn't broken, but it's also now however many weeks
behind. Once 4.3-rc1 arrives with this fixed I'll push all the 4.2-rcN
and 4.2 as well.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists