[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55D076D5.8070601@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:41:09 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv3 01/10] mm: memory hotplug with an existing
resource
On 08/14/2015 04:40 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:21:43 +0100 David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com> wrote:
>
>> On 30/07/15 18:03, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> Add add_memory_resource() to add memory using an existing "System RAM"
>>> resource. This is useful if the memory region is being located by
>>> finding a free resource slot with allocate_resource().
>>>
>>> Xen guests will make use of this in their balloon driver to hotplug
>>> arbitrary amounts of memory in response to toolstack requests.
>> Ping? This enables a useful feature for Xen guests.
>>
> Looks OK to me. I've cc'ed some memory_hotplug.c developers. If
> they're OK with it, please add the patch to the (Xen?) tree which uses
> it.
>
>
>
>
> Add add_memory_resource() to add memory using an existing "System RAM"
> resource. This is useful if the memory region is being located by
> finding a free resource slot with allocate_resource().
>
> Xen guests will make use of this in their balloon driver to hotplug
> arbitrary amounts of memory in response to toolstack requests.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 2 ++
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> index 6ffa0ac..c76d371 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ struct zone;
> struct pglist_data;
> struct mem_section;
> struct memory_block;
> +struct resource;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>
> @@ -266,6 +267,7 @@ static inline void remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) {}
> extern int walk_memory_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> void *arg, int (*func)(struct memory_block *, void *));
> extern int add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
> +extern int add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *resource);
> extern int zone_for_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, int zone_default);
> extern int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
> extern int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages);
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 003dbe4..169770a 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1224,23 +1224,21 @@ int zone_for_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, int zone_default)
> }
>
> /* we are OK calling __meminit stuff here - we have CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
> -int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> +int __ref add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res)
> {
> + u64 start, size;
> pg_data_t *pgdat = NULL;
> bool new_pgdat;
> bool new_node;
> - struct resource *res;
> int ret;
>
> + start = res->start;
> + size = resource_size(res);
> +
> ret = check_hotplug_memory_range(start, size);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - res = register_memory_resource(start, size);
> - ret = -EEXIST;
> - if (!res)
> - return ret;
> -
> { /* Stupid hack to suppress address-never-null warning */
> void *p = NODE_DATA(nid);
> new_pgdat = !p;
> @@ -1290,6 +1288,22 @@ out:
> mem_hotplug_done();
> return ret;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_memory_resource);
> +
> +int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + struct resource *res;
> + int ret;
> +
> + res = register_memory_resource(start, size);
> + if (!res)
> + return -EEXIST;
> +
> + ret = add_memory_resource(nid, res);
> + if (ret < 0)
Not a big deal, but I think "if (ret)" is enough.
The code looks good.
Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Thanks.
> + release_memory_resource(res);
> + return ret;
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_memory);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists