[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55D18509.9080709@nigelcunningham.com.au>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:54:01 +1000
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...elcunningham.com.au>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] x86/efi: Carrying hibernation key by setup data
Hi all.
I've rejoined LKML, so I'll try to help with reviewing PM patches. I'd forgotten how much it is a case of sipping at a fire hydrant!
Regards,
Nigel
On 17/08/15 07:23, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>>> For forwarding hibernation key from EFI stub to boot kernel, this patch
>>> allocates setup data for carrying hibernation key, size and the status
>>> of efi operating.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.com>
>> Jiri, are you sure you reviewed these? This is not really
>> english, afaict, and efi/EFI should be spelled consistently.
> Yes, I did review the code and the fact that it is still in compliance
> with my original idea. I think you can blame me on not reviewing
> changelogs super-rigorously though, so all suggestions for improvements
> are absolutely welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists