[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150817090828.GB5558@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:08:52 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Raphaël Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>
Cc: Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@...el.com>,
Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@...el.com>,
Dean Lee <dean.lee@...el.com>,
Chris Park <chris.park@...el.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: wilc1000: code style: fix macro with
multiple statements
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 01:30:12AM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
> #define MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER(name, size) \
> - exported_ ## name = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); \
> - if (!exported_ ## name) { \
> - printk("fail to alloc: %s memory\n", exported_ ## name); \
> - return -ENOBUFS; \
> - }
> + do { \
> + exported_ ## name = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); \
> + if (!exported_ ## name) { \
> + printk("fail to alloc: %s memory\n", exported_ ## name); \
> + return -ENOBUFS; \
> + }
> + } while (0)
Pull it in one indent level... But actually this macro has a return in
the middle of it, so it just introduces bugs all over the place like
eating cookies in bed. We should just delete it instead.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists