[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150817095617.GA20948@worktop>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:56:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] perf: x86: Improve accuracy of perf/sched clock
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:34:03AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 29/07/15 00:14, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > When TSC is stable perf/sched clock is based on it.
> > However the conversion from cycles to nanoseconds
> > is not as accurate as it could be. Because
> > CYC2NS_SCALE_FACTOR is 10, the accuracy is +/- 1/2048
> >
> > The change is to calculate the maximum shift that
> > results in a multiplier that is still a 32-bit number.
> > For example all frequencies over 1 GHz will have
> > a shift of 32, making the accuracy of the conversion
> > +/- 1/(2^33)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>
> Is this OK?
Yes I think so, sorry I got backlogged with preparation for Seattle.
Thomas, if you see this, could you merge with my ACK on, otherwise I'll
queue it the normal route once I'm back.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists