| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150817095617.GA20948@worktop> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:56:17 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] perf: x86: Improve accuracy of perf/sched clock On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:34:03AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 29/07/15 00:14, Adrian Hunter wrote: > > When TSC is stable perf/sched clock is based on it. > > However the conversion from cycles to nanoseconds > > is not as accurate as it could be. Because > > CYC2NS_SCALE_FACTOR is 10, the accuracy is +/- 1/2048 > > > > The change is to calculate the maximum shift that > > results in a multiplier that is still a 32-bit number. > > For example all frequencies over 1 GHz will have > > a shift of 32, making the accuracy of the conversion > > +/- 1/(2^33) > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> > > Is this OK? Yes I think so, sorry I got backlogged with preparation for Seattle. Thomas, if you see this, could you merge with my ACK on, otherwise I'll queue it the normal route once I'm back. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists