linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] scripts/kernel-doc: Adding cross-reference links to html documentation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55D1DC40.40403@collabora.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:06:08 -0300
From:	Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula <danilo.cesar@...labora.co.uk>
To:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] scripts/kernel-doc: Adding cross-reference links
 to html documentation.

On 08/17/2015 01:10 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:45:15 -0300
> Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula <danilo.cesar@...labora.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> Functions, Structs and Parameters definitions on kernel documentation
>> are pure cosmetic, it only highlights the element.
>>
>> To ease the navigation in the documentation we should use <links> inside
>> those tags so readers can easily jump between methods directly.
>>
>> This was discussed in 2014[1] and is implemented by getting a list
>> of <refentries> from the DocBook XML to generate a database. Then it looks
>> for <function>,<structnames> and <paramdef> tags that matches the ones in
>> the database. As it only links existent references, no broken links are
>> added.
> 
> So I had some airplane time today and was able to mess with this some.  I
> can't make it break anymore, and it clearly improves the resulting
> documentation, so I've applied it to the docs tree for 4.3.
> 
> I want to look at the rest of the stuff a bit more and play with it, but
> it's hard to imagine why we wouldn't want that as well.  I'm a bit more
> leery just because it adds another dependency to the build, even if it's
> an optional dependency.  My thinking at the moment is to apply it shortly

I totally agree about the dependency stuff. I even discussed it with
Daniel Vetter a bit. I started by writing my-very-own-markup-parser to
put alongside kernel-doc to avoid external dependencies, but it gets too
complex too quickly (specially when dealing with tables and multi-line
stuff). It would be a pain to maintain a something like that, and the
world probably doesn't need yet-another-markup-parser, so I decided to
use another tool.

> after the merge window so it can have a long soak in linux-next before a
> 4.4 merge; hope that sounds good.

It does sound good. Thanks!

> 
> Thanks for doing this work,

Glad I could help.


Danilo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/