[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hwfk4ezi=MVpvURmW=hKdXX6mJQYabwisHejd77CW3Sjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:09:33 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
perf group <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Announcing simple-pt -- a simple Processor Trace implementation
for Linux
2015-08-17 6:31 GMT+02:00 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>:
>
> Modern Intel Core CPUs (5th and 6th generation) have a Intel Processor Trace (PT) feature
> to trace branch execution with low overhead. This is useful for performance analysis and debugging.
>
> simple-pt is a simple standalone driver and decoder tool to implement PT on Linux.
>
> Starting with Linux 4.1 Linux has an integrated PT implementation in perf
> (see https://lwn.net/Articles/648154/).
> simple-pt is an alternative implementation. It has many disadvantages over the perf PT
> implementation, such as:
> - needs to run as root
> - no long term tracing or sampling with interrupts
> - no support for interactive debugging (use gdb 7.10 on perf for that)
> - no support for histograms
> - somewhat experimental
> - not as well supported as perf
>
> On the positive side simple-pt is:
> - simple
> - standalone. No kernel changes needed. Could be ported to older kernels or other operating systems
> - easy to modify and experiment with
> - more ftrace like decoding tool
> - support for kprobes based triggers
> - modular “unix style” design with simple tools that do only one thing each
> - BSD licensed
>
> Example output:
>
>
> % sptcmd -c tcall taskset -c 0 ./tcall
> cpu 0 offset 1027688, 1003 KB, writing to ptout.0
> ...
> Wrote sideband to ptout.sideband
> % sptdecode --sideband ptout.sideband --pt ptout.0 | less
> TIME DELTA INSNs OPERATION
> frequency 32
> 0 [+0] [+ 1] _dl_aux_init+436
> [+ 6] __libc_start_main+455 -> _dl_discover_osversion
> ...
> [+ 13] __libc_start_main+446 -> main
> [+ 9] main+22 -> f1
> [+ 4] f1+9 -> f2
> [+ 2] f1+19 -> f2
> [+ 5] main+22 -> f1
> [+ 4] f1+9 -> f2
> [+ 2] f1+19 -> f2
> [+ 5] main+22 -> f1
Nice. So I guess +x is the address offset. How hard would it be to
translate to file lines?
Thanks.
> ...
>
> Available from https://github.com/andikleen/simple-pt
>
> --
> ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists