[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150817161450.GA4079968@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:14:51 -0700
From: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <Kernel-team@...com>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: improve unstable clocksource detection
ping, any comments?
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:12:53AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> From time to time we saw TSC is marked as unstable in our systems, while
> the CPUs declare to have stable TSC. Looking at the clocksource unstable
> detection, there are two problems:
> - watchdog clock source wrap. HPET is the most common watchdog clock
> source. It's 32-bit and runs in 14.3Mhz. That means the hpet counter
> can wrap in about 5 minutes.
> - threshold isn't scaled against interval. The threshold is 0.0625s in
> 0.5s interval. What if the actual interval is bigger than 0.5s?
>
> The watchdog runs in a timer bh, so hard/soft irq can defer its running.
> Heavy network stack softirq can hog a cpu. IPMI driver can disable
> interrupt for a very long time. The first problem is mostly we are
> suffering I think.
>
> Here is a simple patch to fix the issues. If the waterdog doesn't run
> for a long time, we ignore the detection. This should work for the two
> problems. For the second one, we probably doen't need to scale if the
> interval isn't very long.
>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
> ---
> kernel/time/clocksource.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> index 841b72f..8417c83 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> @@ -122,9 +122,10 @@ static int clocksource_watchdog_kthread(void *data);
> static void __clocksource_change_rating(struct clocksource *cs, int rating);
>
> /*
> - * Interval: 0.5sec Threshold: 0.0625s
> + * Interval: 0.5sec MaxInterval: 1s Threshold: 0.0625s
> */
> #define WATCHDOG_INTERVAL (HZ >> 1)
> +#define WATCHDOG_MAX_INTERVAL_NS (NSEC_PER_SEC)
> #define WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD (NSEC_PER_SEC >> 4)
>
> static void clocksource_watchdog_work(struct work_struct *work)
> @@ -217,7 +218,9 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(unsigned long data)
> continue;
>
> /* Check the deviation from the watchdog clocksource. */
> - if ((abs(cs_nsec - wd_nsec) > WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD)) {
> + if ((abs(cs_nsec - wd_nsec) > WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD) &&
> + cs_nsec < WATCHDOG_MAX_INTERVAL_NS &&
> + wd_nsec < WATCHDOG_MAX_INTERVAL_NS) {
> pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog: Marking clocksource '%s' as unstable because the skew is too large:\n",
> cs->name);
> pr_warn(" '%s' wd_now: %llx wd_last: %llx mask: %llx\n",
> --
> 1.8.5.6
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists