lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-6e38f1e79d16f4fa9e5cf06792500e11c96a6f84@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:28:02 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Len Brown <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...capital.net,
	mingo@...nel.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	zhugh.fnst@...fujitsu.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	imammedo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	jschoenh@...zon.de, tglx@...utronix.de, len.brown@...el.com,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:x86/boot] x86/smpboot: Remove udelay(100)
  when polling cpu_initialized_map

Commit-ID:  6e38f1e79d16f4fa9e5cf06792500e11c96a6f84
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/6e38f1e79d16f4fa9e5cf06792500e11c96a6f84
Author:     Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:45:45 -0400
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:42:27 +0200

x86/smpboot: Remove udelay(100) when polling cpu_initialized_map

After the BSP sends the APIC INIT/SIPI/SIPI to the AP,
it waits for the AP to come up and indicate that it is alive
by setting its own bit in the cpu_initialized_mask.

Linux polls for up to 10 seconds for this to happen.
Each polling loop has a udelay(100) and a call to schedule().

The udelay(100) adds no value.

For example, on my desktop, the BSP waits for the
other 3 CPUs to come on line at boot for 305, 404, 405 usec.
For resume from S3, it waits 317, 404, 405 usec.

But when the udelay(100) is removed, the BSP waits
305, 310, 306 for boot, and 305, 307, 306 for resume.

So for both boot and resume, removing the udelay(100)
speeds online by about 100us in 2 of 3 cases.

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
Cc: Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@...zon.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/33ef746c67d2489cad0a9b1958cf71167232ff2b.1439739165.git.len.brown@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index b1f3ed9c..9ad88fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
 
 	if (!boot_error) {
 		/*
-		 * Wait 10s total for a response from AP
+		 * Wait 10s total for first sign of life from AP
 		 */
 		boot_error = -1;
 		timeout = jiffies + 10*HZ;
@@ -911,7 +911,6 @@ static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
 				boot_error = 0;
 				break;
 			}
-			udelay(100);
 			schedule();
 		}
 	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ