[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw4pjStVG6zqqS7VCeWvqH+mKcGV_CwqqyRbB1NGcZqug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:47:01 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Any objections against removing all of math-emu in v4.3? This would simplify the
> FPU code in various places beyond math-emu/.
Hmm. I guess we could just try. The fact that you argue that the FP
emulation likely hasn't worked for a few years is a pretty powerful
argument that nobody has cared. And if somebody does, and ends up
having a use case and willing to test, we can always re-animate the
zombie that is math emu support.
Considering that we don't support the old i386 any more, the only chip
I know of that needs it is the i486sx. However, there are probably
several clone chips that did the "we're a 486" thing by adding the few
integer instructions but not doing a FPU. And there might well be
various embedded versions of the 486 that might even be in use still.
But afaik most distributions have required Pentium of P6-level
capabilities for some time, and I guess any existing old systems
aren't going to upgrade their kernels anyway.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists