linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F96A2BC9-B57F-4360-9DF2-A252BB9462B7@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:58:10 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes

That is not true.  It *does* work, and I have tested it fairly recently.

On August 17, 2015 9:47:01 AM PDT, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Any objections against removing all of math-emu in v4.3? This would
>simplify the
>> FPU code in various places beyond math-emu/.
>
>Hmm. I guess we could just try. The fact that you argue that the FP
>emulation likely hasn't worked for a few years is a pretty powerful
>argument that nobody has cared. And if somebody does, and ends up
>having a use case and willing to test, we can always re-animate the
>zombie that is math emu support.
>
>Considering that we don't support the old i386 any more, the only chip
>I know of that needs it is the i486sx. However, there are probably
>several clone chips that did the "we're a 486" thing by adding the few
>integer instructions but not doing a FPU. And there might well be
>various embedded versions of the 486 that might even be in use still.
>But afaik most distributions have required Pentium of P6-level
>capabilities for some time, and I guess any existing old systems
>aren't going to upgrade their kernels anyway.
>
>                      Linus

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/