[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150817172623.GO10748@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:26:23 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>, balbi@...com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sojka@...ica.cz,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, r.baldyga@...sung.com,
yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
device-mainlining@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, sre@...nel.org,
dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
lee.jones@...aro.org, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] power: wm831x_power: Support USB charger current
limit management
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:07:08AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 05:47:46PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > + 1500,
> > + 1800,
> > + 550,
> > +};
> Why 550 is the last, but not 1800?
You'd have to ask the hardware engineers who designed the chip. I
suspect it's because 550 was added at a late stage in the design process
but I'm basically just guessing there.
> > *********************************************************************/
> > @@ -606,8 +646,31 @@ static int wm831x_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> > }
> > + if (wm831x_pdata && wm831x_pdata->usb_gadget) {
> Where the wm831x_pdata->usb_gadget is initialized?
It's platform data, it will be initialised by whatever registers the
platform data.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists