lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:27:01 +0800
From:	yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [x86] copy_from{to}_user question


> On Aug 14, 2015, at 00:43, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 06:04:54PM +0800, yalin wang wrote:
>> we store type into one fix register, for example r12 ,
>> then in fix up code, we can know the exception is caused by copy_from
>> copy_to or copy_in user function by check r12 value(0 , 1 ,2 value), then if 
>> it is copy_from, we only allow read fault, if the exception is write fault, panic() .
>> 
>> the same rules also apply to copy_to / copy_in function .
>> 
>> is it possible to change it like this ?
> 
> ... and we'll do all that jumping through hoops to fix what actual,
> real-life problem exactly?
i just want the x86 copy_from{to,in}_user() function have 
the same behaviour as other platforms.
and can disclose potential BUGs in kernel, if do like this.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ