linux-kernel - Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:02:57 -0400
From:	Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>,
	Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Alex Deucher, Mark Rustad and Alexander Holler reported a regression
> with the latest v4.2-rc4 kernel, which breaks some SATA controllers.
> With multi-MSI capable SATA controllers, only the first port works,
> all other ports times out when executing SATA commands. This regression
> bisects to 52f518a3a7c2 ("x86/MSI: Use hierarchical irqdomains to manage
> MSI interrupts"), but it's not the root cause, it just triggers a bug
> caused by b5dc8e6c21e7 ("x86/irq: Use hierarchical irqdomain to manage
> CPU interrupt vectors").
>
> With this patch applied, the affected SATA controllers work as expected.

I don't see this upstream yet.  Any chance this will make 4.2?

Alex

>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> Reported-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Mark Rustad <mrustad@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
> ---
> Hi Alex, Mark and Alexandler,
>         Sorry for the long delay to root cause this regression, it's
> really annoying. Could you please help test this patch against the
> latest v4.2-rcx?
> Thanks!
> Gerry
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> index f813261d9740..2683f36e4e0a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int x86_vector_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>                 irq_data->chip = &lapic_controller;
>                 irq_data->chip_data = data;
>                 irq_data->hwirq = virq + i;
> -               err = assign_irq_vector_policy(virq, irq_data->node, data,
> +               err = assign_irq_vector_policy(virq + i, irq_data->node, data,
>                                                info);
>                 if (err)
>                         goto error;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/