[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN3PR0301MB08672520CA978383BBF2CF6CFE790@BN3PR0301MB0867.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 03:42:37 +0000
From: Huan Wang <alison.wang@...escale.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Geanta Neag Horia <Horia.Geanta@...escale.com>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <Fabio.Estevam@...escale.com>,
Jin Jason <Jason.Jin@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] ARM: configs: Add Freescale LS1021A defconfig
Hi, Fabio,
Based on the analysis and discussion, we prefer to use ls1021a_defconfig and remove LS1021A from imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Horia Geantă
> <horia.geanta@...escale.com> wrote:
>
> > Another thing:
> > Commit 385c0fb0e2c4 ("ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Select LS1021A")
> added
> > CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A in imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
> >
> > Besides this, booting a LS1021 AQDS board (Rev2) using
> > imx_v6_v7_defconfig did not work (stuck at "Starting kernel").
>
> What would be the recommended approach?
>
> - Fix imx_v6_v7_defconfig so that it can make LS1021A to boot
>
> or
>
> - Use this proposed ls1021a_defconfig and remove LS1021A from
> imx_v6_v7_defconfig?
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabio Estevam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists