linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] pmem: add copy_from_iter_pmem() and clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:23:18 -0600
From:	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] pmem: add copy_from_iter_pmem() and clear_pmem()

On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 21:10 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > +#include <linux/uio.h>
> > +
> 
> Can we keep this in linux/pmem.h?  I'm pretty sure the stubs would need
> it as well, and even if they don't it'll keep the includes consistent.

Sure.

> > +{
> > +	size_t len;
> > +
> > +	len = copy_from_iter_nocache((void __force *)addr, bytes, i);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * copy_from_iter_nocache() on x86 only uses non-temporal stores for
> > +	 * iovec iterators, so for other types (bvec & kvec) we must do a
> > +	 * cache write-back.
> 
> Shouldn't we fi that?

I'm not sure - When Al make copy_from_iter_nocache() it was just a copy of
copy_from_iter(), with the iovec case changed to use
__copy_from_user_nocache().  The other cases use memcpy_from_page() and
memcpy().  To have everything do non-temporal stores we'd probably need to
make non-temporal versions of each of those (alluded to by Al's comment in the
copy_from_iter_nocache() commit: "BTW, do we want memcpy_nocache()?").

> > +	 */
> > +	if (iter_is_iovec(i) == false)
> > +		__arch_wb_cache_pmem(addr, bytes);
> 
> And if not and iter_needs_pmem_wb helper to encode this knowledge would
> be useful.

Maybe this should be the short-term solution, and I'll add a TODO to fix the
copy_from_iter_nocache() implementation as described above so we can always
have non-temporal stores?

> > +static inline void arch_clear_pmem(void __pmem *addr, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +	/* TODO: implement the zeroing via non-temporal writes */
> > +	if (size == PAGE_SIZE && ((unsigned long)addr & ~PAGE_MASK) == 0)
> > +		clear_page((void __force *)addr);
> > +	else
> > +		memset((void __force *)addr, 0, size);
> > +
> > +	__arch_wb_cache_pmem(addr, size);
> 
> Please add a local vaiable so that the __force casting is only needed
> once.  Same for other functions with this pattern.

Sure.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/