[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55D2923E.7030202@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:02:38 +0800
From: Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: rjw@...ysocki.net, pavel@....cz, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, suspend: Save/restore THERM_CONTROL register for
suspend
(not sure if previous reply has been sent out)
Hi, Ingo, thanks for your review,
On 08/17/2015 06:11 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com> wrote:
>
>
> So what your changelog fails to mention:
>
> - You only add this code to the 64-bit kernel. Are 32-bit kernels not affected?
>
I missed the 32-bit case, I'll adjust them to 32/64-bit common path.
> - the MSR read is done unconditionally. Is MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL available
> architecturally and readable (and has sensible values) on all 64-bit capable
> x86 CPUs that run this code path?
>
MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL is avaliable on Intel Pentium 4, Xeon, Pentium M
and later processors, so I think not all of the 32/64-bit x86 CPUs have
this regiser. Maybe codes like this would be more reasonable?
save:
ctx->clock_modulation_saved = !rdmsrl_safe(MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL,
&ctxt->clock_modulation);
retore:
if (ctxt->clock_modulation_saved)
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL, ctxt->clock_modulation);
Best Regards,
Yu
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists