[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150818160749.GJ10748@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:07:49 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>
Cc: Leilk Liu <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: mediatek: fix spi incorrect endian usage and remove
redundant clock
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 02:19:54PM +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> The usual philosophy is to have one change per patch, so this might be
> better as three patches. But this is Mark's call. Since the driver
> isn't yet in Linus' tree, it might be a-ok to mix style improvements
> and actual fixes, but as soon as it landed in Linus' tree you need to
> keep them separate, so fixes can be easily backported.
This isn't just about making the fixes easy to backport, it's also about
making the patch reviewable and understandable. When many changes are
included in one patch it makes it harder to tell what any one part of
the patch is intended to do. As Jonas has identified several bugs
you'll need to resend anyway, please split the series up.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists