[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE_Gge0EDaE=zQp9YBDJSd_1VjU1a8-zoPkyKxqPc2THi2b=eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:06:39 -0400
From: Raphaël Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@...el.com>,
Dean Lee <dean.lee@...el.com>,
Chris Park <chris.park@...el.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] staging: wilc1000: replace MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro
to avoid possible memory leak
2015-08-18 5:15 GMT-04:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>:
> To be honest, I have lost track of this patchset. If you are planning
> to redo the other patches can you send it in a new thread?
Actually, Greg already included the "return statement" and
"DECLARE_WILC_BUFFER" ones.
The replacement of printk by netdev_* needs more work on my side to
get the net_device to be able to use the netdev_* functions.
And apparently Greg already received another patch with the
"FREE_WILC_BUFFER" replacement, though I don't see it in the
staging-testing tree yet.
So, I think this patch is the last one of this patchset that has to be
treated! That's why I rebased it on top of the current staging-testing
tree on my last send.
Thanks,
Raphaël
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists