[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABxcv==hssVa-b=cOjh3QhEOmQPZVvEPt0apLHQOva3GjJb9PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:30:18 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties
Hello Heiko,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
>
> thanks for catching these oversights, but see below
>
> Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 11:44:15 schrieb Brian Norris:
>> This DTS file was submitted with non-upstream bindings. I happened
>> across this while reviewing the jaq DTS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
>> Cc: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>
>> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> Tested on jaq, not minnie
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts index
>> 0e30bd6bf92b..6f619c154dc6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
>> @@ -128,12 +128,16 @@
>> regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> regulator-name = "vcc33_touch";
>> - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
>> + regulator-state-mem {
>> + regulator-on-in-suspend;
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> vcc5v_touch: SWITCH_REG2 {
>> regulator-name = "vcc5v_touch";
>> - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
>> + regulator-state-mem {
>> + regulator-on-in-suspend;
>> + };
>
> wouldn't regulator-suspend-mem-disabled translate to regulator-off-in-suspend?
Correct, the downstream regulator-suspend-mem-disabled is equivalent
to regulator-off-in-suspend in mainline.
> At least looks like it according to https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/592
>
I guess you meant https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/10/162 since it was
Chanwoo's and not Vincent's version that finally landed.
>
> Heiko
>
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists