linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:30:18 +0200
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
To:	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:	Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

Hello Heiko,

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
>
> thanks for catching these oversights, but see below
>
> Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 11:44:15 schrieb Brian Norris:
>> This DTS file was submitted with non-upstream bindings. I happened
>> across this while reviewing the jaq DTS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
>> Cc: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>
>> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> Tested on jaq, not minnie
>>
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts | 8 ++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts index
>> 0e30bd6bf92b..6f619c154dc6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts
>> @@ -128,12 +128,16 @@
>>                       regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>                       regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>                       regulator-name = "vcc33_touch";
>> -                     regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
>> +                     regulator-state-mem {
>> +                             regulator-on-in-suspend;
>> +                     };
>>               };
>>
>>               vcc5v_touch: SWITCH_REG2 {
>>                       regulator-name = "vcc5v_touch";
>> -                     regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
>> +                     regulator-state-mem {
>> +                             regulator-on-in-suspend;
>> +                     };
>
> wouldn't regulator-suspend-mem-disabled translate to regulator-off-in-suspend?

Correct, the downstream regulator-suspend-mem-disabled is equivalent
to regulator-off-in-suspend in mainline.

> At least looks like it according to https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/592
>

I guess you meant https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/10/162 since it was
Chanwoo's and not Vincent's version that finally landed.

>
> Heiko
>

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/