[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2559509.ITzpmR5XN3@phil>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:28:06 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ASoC: rockchip: Add rockchip SPDIF transceiver driver
Hi Sjoerd,
Am Mittwoch, 19. August 2015, 08:56:48 schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
> Hey Heiko,
>
> Thanks for the comments, i'm hoping to address them and Marks comments
> in a next patch series next week.
>
> On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 20:25 +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > +
> > > + spdif->hclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "spdif_hclk");
> >
> > I guess this could be named just "hclk" - as it is the identifier
> > local to the spdif-ip. (Of course in the binding too)
>
> I'm entirely happy to change that, just wanted to note that the reason
> i used spdif_hclk and spidf_clk is for consistency with the rockchip
> -i2s binding which uses i2s_hclk ans i2s_mclk.
I was also just remembering something Thierry Reding said in the edp thread:
"The names are in a per-driver scope, so "dp-phy" is implied by the device
tree binding and driver already. You could simply use shorter names such as
"phy" and "24m" for example."
> However i guess we could update the i2s binding at some poit as well to
> follow similar names (with fallbacks to the old one). In general a lot
> of the comments yourself and Mark have given actually apply to the
> rockchip-i2s code as well so there is some cleanup to do there :)
I'm not sure about updating the binding though, as it we'd need to provide
backwards-compatibility for the old names as well. So I don't think renaming
these will bring much benefit, but we can choose better names for followup
drivers like the spdif.
I haven't looked to much into the i2s stuff yet. But with me getting a grasp on
the fractional dividers and the hardware drivers making it into the asoc tree
now, I also plan to give the i2s audio on the Chromebooks a try :-)
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists