[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150819025942.GD4588@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:59:42 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Raphaël Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@...el.com>,
Dean Lee <dean.lee@...el.com>,
Chris Park <chris.park@...el.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] staging: wilc1000: replace MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro
to avoid possible memory leak
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:06:39PM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
> 2015-08-18 5:15 GMT-04:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>:
> > To be honest, I have lost track of this patchset. If you are planning
> > to redo the other patches can you send it in a new thread?
>
> Actually, Greg already included the "return statement" and
> "DECLARE_WILC_BUFFER" ones.
> The replacement of printk by netdev_* needs more work on my side to
> get the net_device to be able to use the netdev_* functions.
> And apparently Greg already received another patch with the
> "FREE_WILC_BUFFER" replacement, though I don't see it in the
> staging-testing tree yet.
Maybe it was something else, but it would not apply. Please use git
rebase to figure it out and resend all of your outstanding patches, I
too am confused at this point.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists