[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1439954620.3479.30.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 05:23:40 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, lizefan@...wei.com,
cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified
hierarchy
On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 13:31 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> So, this is a trade-off we're consciously making. If there are
> common-enough use cases which require jumping across different cgroup
> domains, we'll try to figure out a way to accomodate those but by
> default migration is a very cold and expensive path.
Hm. I know of a big data outfit to which attach/detach performance was
important enough for them to have plucked an old experimental overhead
reduction hack (mine) off lkml, and shipped it. It must have mattered a
LOT for them (not suicidal crash test dummies) to have done that.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists