[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUJQNWuJM_WMA1D_=OZ47WVXrmtw+ZF+-T0r=j1=9uUdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 08:54:20 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Context-track syscalls before enabling interrupts
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>> This fixes a couple minor holes if we took an IRQ very early in syscall
>> processing:
>>
>
> The patch is buggy. v2 coming soon, hopefully.
>
No, let's drop this for now. It would be straightforward but quite
messy to fix it, and I don't want to introduce further
incomprehensibility into the asm. I'll send the warning change
instead, and we can fix it better for 4.4
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists