[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1440004734-24290-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:18:54 -0400
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86, bitops, variable_test_bit should return 1 not -1 on a match
This issue was noticed while debugging a CPU hotplug issue. On x86
with (NR_CPUS > 1) the cpu_online() define is cpumask_test_cpu().
cpumask_test_cpu() should return 1 if the cpu is set in cpumask and
0 otherwise.
However, cpumask_test_cpu() returns -1 if the cpu in the cpumask is
set and 0 otherwise. This happens because cpumask_test_cpu() calls
test_bit() which is a define that will call variable_test_bit().
variable_test_bit() calls the assembler instruction sbb (Subtract
with Borrow, " Subtracts the source from the destination, and subtracts 1
extra if the Carry Flag is set. Results are returned in "dest".)
A bit match results in -1 being returned from variable_test_bit() if a
match occurs, not 1 as the function is supposed to. This can be easily
resolved by adding a "!!" to force 0 or 1 as a return.
It looks like the code never does, for example, (test_bit() == 1) so this
change should not have any impact.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
index cfe3b95..a87a5fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static inline int variable_test_bit(long nr, volatile const unsigned long *addr)
: "=r" (oldbit)
: "m" (*(unsigned long *)addr), "Ir" (nr));
- return oldbit;
+ return !!oldbit;
}
#if 0 /* Fool kernel-doc since it doesn't do macros yet */
--
1.7.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists