| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1440010044-3402-9-git-send-email-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:47:18 +0100 From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 08/14] sched/tune: add detailed documentation The topic of a single simple power-performance tunable, that is wholly scheduler centric, and has well defined and predictable properties has come up on several occasions in the past. With techniques such as a scheduler driven DVFS, we now have a good framework for implementing such a tunable. This patch provides a detailed description of the motivations and design decisions behind the implementation of the SchedTune. cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com> --- Documentation/scheduler/sched-tune.txt | 367 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 367 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/scheduler/sched-tune.txt diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-tune.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-tune.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cb795e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-tune.txt @@ -0,0 +1,367 @@ + Central, scheduler-driven, power-performance control + (EXPERIMENTAL) + +Abstract +======== + +The topic of a single simple power-performance tunable, that is wholly +scheduler centric, and has well defined and predictable properties has come up +on several occasions in the past [1,2]. With techniques such as a scheduler +driven DVFS [3], we now have a good framework for implementing such a tunable. +This document describes the overall ideas behind its design and implementation. + + +Table of Contents +================= + +1. Motivation +2. Introduction +3. Signal Boosting Strategy +4. OPP selection using boosted CPU utilization +5. Per task group boosting +6. Question and Answers + - What about "auto" mode? + - What about boosting on a congested system? + - How CPUs are boosted when we have tasks with multiple boost values? +7. References + + +1. Motivation +============= + +Sched-DVFS [3] is a new event-driven cpufreq governor which allows the +scheduler to select the optimal DVFS operating point (OPP) for running a task +allocated to a CPU. The introduction of sched-DVFS enables running workloads at +the most energy efficient OPPs. + +However, sometimes it may be desired to intentionally boost the performance of +a workload even if that could imply a reasonable increase in energy +consumption. For example, in order to reduce the response time of a task, we +may want to run the task at a higher OPP than the one that is actually required +by it's CPU bandwidth demand. + +This last requirement is especially important if we consider that one of the +main goals of the sched-DVFS component is to replace all currently available +CPUFreq policies. Since sched-DVFS is event based, as opposed to the sampling +driven governors we currently have, it is already more responsive at selecting +the optimal OPP to run tasks allocated to a CPU. However, just tracking the +actual task load demand may not be enough from a performance standpoint. For +example, it is not possible to get behaviors similar to those provided by the +"performance" and "interactive" CPUFreq governors. + +This document describes an implementation of a tunable, stacked on top of the +sched-DVFS which extends its functionality to support task performance +boosting. + +By "performance boosting" we mean the reduction of the time required to +complete a task activation, i.e. the time elapsed from a task wakeup to its +next deactivation (e.g. because it goes back to sleep or it terminates). For +example, if we consider a simple periodic task which executes the same workload +for 5[s] every 20[s] while running at a certain OPP, a boosted execution of +that task must complete each of its activations in less than 5[s]. + +A previous attempt [5] to introduce such a boosting feature has not been +successful mainly because of the complexity of the proposed solution. The +approach described in this document exposes a single simple interface to +user-space. This single tunable knob allows the tuning of system wide +scheduler behaviours ranging from energy efficiency at one end through to +incremental performance boosting at the other end. This first tunable affects +all tasks. However, a more advanced extension of the concept is also provided +which uses CGroups to boost the performance of only selected tasks while using +the energy efficient default for all others. + +The rest of this document introduces in more details the proposed solution +which has been named SchedTune. + + +2. Introduction +=============== + +SchedTune exposes a simple user-space interface with a single power-performance +tunable: + + /proc/sys/kernel/sched_cfs_boost + +This permits expressing a boost value as an integer in the range [0..100]. + +A value of 0 (default) configures the CFS scheduler for maximum energy +efficiency. This means that sched-DVFS runs the tasks at the minimum OPP +required to satisfy their workload demand. +A value of 100 configures scheduler for maximum performance, which translates +to the selection of the maximum OPP on that CPU. + +The range between 0 and 100 can be set to satisfy other scenarios suitably. For +example to satisfy interactive response or depending on other system events +(battery level etc). + +A CGroup based extension is also provided, which permits further user-space +defined task classification to tune the scheduler for different goals depending +on the specific nature of the task, e.g. background vs interactive vs +low-priority. + +The overall design of the SchedTune module is built on top of "Per-Entity Load +Tracking" (PELT) signals and sched-DVFS by introducing a bias on the Operating +Performance Point (OPP) selection. +Each time a task is allocated on a CPU, sched-DVFS has the opportunity to tune +the operating frequency of that CPU to better match the workload demand. The +selection of the actual OPP being activated is influenced by the global boost +value, or the boost value for the task CGroup when in use. + +This simple biasing approach leverages existing frameworks, which means minimal +modifications to the scheduler, and yet it allows to achieve a range of +different behaviours all from a single simple tunable knob. +The only new concept introduced is that of signal boosting. + + +3. Signal Boosting Strategy +=========================== + +The whole PELT machinery works based on the value of a few load tracking signals +which basically track the CPU bandwidth requirements for tasks and the capacity +of CPUs. The basic idea behind the SchedTune knob is to artificially inflate +some of these load tracking signals to make a task or RQ appears more demanding +that it actually is. + +Which signals have to be inflated depends on the specific "consumer". However, +independently from the specific (signal, consumer) pair, it is important to +define a simple and possibly consistent strategy for the concept of boosting a +signal. + +A boosting strategy defines how the "abstract" user-space defined +sched_cfs_boost value is translated into an internal "margin" value to be added +to a signal to get its inflated value: + + margin := boosting_strategy(sched_cfs_boost, signal) + boosted_signal := signal + margin + +Different boosting strategies were identified and analyzed before selecting the +one found to be most effective. + +Signal Proportional Compensation (SPC) +-------------------------------------- + +In this boosting strategy the sched_cfs_boost value is used to compute a +margin which is proportional to the complement of the original signal. +When a signal has a maximum possible value, its complement is defined as +the delta from the actual value and its possible maximum. + +Since the tunable implementation uses signals which have SCHED_LOAD_SCALE as +the maximum possible value, the margin becomes: + + margin := sched_cfs_boost * (SCHED_LOAD_SCALE - signal) + +Using this boosting strategy: +- a 100% sched_cfs_boost means that the signal is scaled to the maximum value +- each value in the range of sched_cfs_boost effectively inflates the signal in + question by a quantity which is proportional to the maximum value. + +For example, by applying the SPC boosting strategy to the selection of the OPP +to run a task it is possible to achieve these behaviors: + +- 0% boosting: run the task at the minimum OPP required by its workload +- 100% boosting: run the task at the maximum OPP available for the CPU +- 50% boosting: run at the half-way OPP between minimum and maximum + +Which means that, at 50% boosting, a task will be scheduled to run at half of +the maximum theoretically achievable performance on the specific target +platform. + +A graphical representation of an SPC boosted signal is represented in the +following figure where: + a) "-" represents the original signal + b) "b" represents a 50% boosted signal + c) "p" represents a 100% boosted signal + + + ^ + | SCHED_LOAD_SCALE + +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ + |pppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp + | + | boosted_signal + | bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb + | + | original signal + | bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb+----------------------+ + | | + |bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb | + | | + | | + | | + | +-----------------------+ + | | + | | + | | + |------------------+ + | + | + +-----------------------------------------------------------------------> + +The plot above shows a ramped load signal (titled 'original_signal') and it's +boosted equivalent. For each step of the original signal the boosted signal +corresponding to a 50% boost is midway from the original signal and the upper +bound. Boosting by 100% generates a boosted signal which is always saturated to +the upper bound. + + +4. OPP selection using boosted CPU utilization +============================================== + +It is worth calling out that the implementation does not introduce any new load +signals. Instead, it provides an API to tune existing signals. This tuning is +done on demand and only in scheduler code paths where it is sensible to do so. +The new API calls are defined to return either the default signal or a boosted +one, depending on the value of sched_cfs_boost. This is a clean an non invasive +modification of the existing existing code paths. + +The signal representing a CPU's utilization is boosted according to the +previously described SPC boosting strategy. To sched-DVFS, this allows a CPU +(ie CFS run-queue) to appear more used then it actually is. + +Thus, with the sched_cfs_boost enabled we have the following main functions to +get the current utilization of a CPU: + + cpu_util() + boosted_cpu_util() + +The new boosted_cpu_util() is similar to the first but returns a boosted +utilization signal which is a function of the sched_cfs_boost value. + +This function is used in the CFS scheduler code paths where sched-DVFS needs to +decide the OPP to run a CPU at. +For example, this allows selecting the highest OPP for a CPU which has +the boost value set to 100%. + + +5. Per task group boosting +========================== + +The availability of a single knob which is used to boost all tasks in the +system is certainly a simple solution but it quite likely doesn't fit many +utilization scenarios, especially in the mobile device space. + +For example, on battery powered devices there usually are many background +services which are long running and need energy efficient scheduling. On the +other hand, some applications are more performance sensitive and require an +interactive response and/or maximum performance, regardless of the energy cost. +To better service such scenarios, the SchedTune implementation has an extension +that provides a more fine grained boosting interface. + +A new CGroup controller, namely "schedtune", could be enabled which allows to +defined and configure task groups with different boosting values. +Tasks that require special performance can be put into separate CGroups. +The value of the boost associated with the tasks in this group can be specified +using a single knob exposed by the CGroup controller: + + schedtune.boost + +This knob allows the definition of a boost value that is to be used for +SPC boosting of all tasks attached to this group. + +The current schedtune controller implementation is really simple and has these +main characteristics: + + 1) It is only possible to create 1 level depth hierarchies + + The root control groups define the system-wide boost value to be applied + by default to all tasks. Its direct subgroups are named "boost groups" and + they define the boost value for specific set of tasks. + Further nested subgroups are not allowed since they do not have a sensible + meaning from a user-space standpoint. + + 2) It is possible to define only a limited number of "boost groups" + + This number is defined at compile time and by default configured to 16. + This is a design decision motivated by two main reasons: + a) In a real system we do not expect utilization scenarios with more then few + boost groups. For example, a reasonable collection of groups could be + just "background", "interactive" and "performance". + b) It simplifies the implementation considerably, especially for the code + which has to compute the per CPU boosting once there are multiple + RUNNABLE tasks with different boost values. + +Such a simple design should allow servicing the main utilization scenarios identified +so far. It provides a simple interface which can be used to manage the +power-performance of all tasks or only selected tasks. +Moreover, this interface can be easily integrated by user-space run-times (e.g. +Android, ChromeOS) to implement a QoS solution for task boosting based on tasks +classification, which has been a long standing requirement. + +Setup and usage +--------------- + +0. Use a kernel with CGROUP_SCHEDTUNE support enabled + +1. Check that the "schedtune" CGroup controller is available: + + root@...aro-nano:~# cat /proc/cgroups + #subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled + cpuset 0 1 1 + cpu 0 1 1 + schedtune 0 1 1 + +2. Mount a tmpfs to create the CGroups mount point (Optional) + + root@...aro-nano:~# sudo mount -t tmpfs cgroups /sys/fs/cgroup + +3. Mount the "schedtune" controller + + root@...aro-nano:~# mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/stune + root@...aro-nano:~# sudo mount -t cgroup -o schedtune stune /sys/fs/cgroup/stune + +4. Setup the system-wide boost value (Optional) + + If not configured the root control group has a 0% boost value, which + basically disables boosting for all tasks in the system thus running in + an energy-efficient mode. + + root@...aro-nano:~# echo $SYSBOOST > /sys/fs/cgroup/stune/schedtune.boost + +5. Create task groups and configure their specific boost value (Optional) + + For example here we create a "performance" boost group configure to boost + all its tasks to 100% + + root@...aro-nano:~# mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/stune/performance + root@...aro-nano:~# echo 100 > /sys/fs/cgroup/stune/performance/schedtune.boost + +6. Move tasks into the boost group + + For example, the following moves the tasks with PID $TASKPID (and all its + threads) into the "performance" boost group. + + root@...aro-nano:~# echo "TASKPID > /sys/fs/cgroup/stune/performance/cgroup.procs + +This simple configuration allows only the threads of the $TASKPID task to run, +when needed, at the highest OPP in the most capable CPU of the system. + + +6. Question and Answers +======================= + +What about "auto" mode? +----------------------- + +The 'auto' mode as described in [5] can be implemented by interfacing SchedTune +with some suitable user-space element. This element could use the exposed +system-wide or cgroup based interface. + +How are multiple groups of tasks with different boost values managed? +--------------------------------------------------------------------- + +The current SchedTune implementation keeps track of the boosted RUNNABLE tasks +on a CPU. Once sched-DVFS selects the OPP to run a CPU at, the CPU utilization +is boosted with a value which is the maximum of the boost values of the +currently RUNNABLE tasks in its RQ. + +This allows sched-DVFS to boost a CPU only while there are boosted tasks ready +to run and switch back to the energy efficient mode as soon as the last boosted +task is dequeued. + + +7. References +============= +[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/552889 +[2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/18/91 +[3] http://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/26/620 + -- 2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists