linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] nd_blk: add support for "read flush" DSM flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:06:51 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Christoph Jaeger <cj@...ux.com>,
	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Yalin Wang <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nd_blk: add support for "read flush" DSM flag

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Add support for the "read flush" _DSM flag, as outlined in the DSM spec:
>
> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DSM_Interface_Example.pdf
>
> This flag tells the ND BLK driver that it needs to flush the cache lines
> associated with the aperture after the aperture is moved but before any
> new data is read.  This ensures that any stale cache lines from the
> previous contents of the aperture will be discarded from the processor
> cache, and the new data will be read properly from the DIMM.  We know
> that the cache lines are clean and will be discarded without any
> writeback because either a) the previous aperture operation was a read,
> and we never modified the contents of the aperture, or b) the previous
> aperture operation was a write and we must have written back the dirtied
> contents of the aperture to the DIMM before the I/O was completed.
>
> By supporting the "read flush" flag we can also change the ND BLK
> aperture mapping from write-combining to write-back via memremap().
>
> In order to add support for the "read flush" flag I needed to add a
> generic routine to invalidate cache lines, mmio_flush_range().  This is
> protected by the ARCH_HAS_MMIO_FLUSH Kconfig variable, and is currently
> only supported on x86.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
[..]
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> index 7c2638f..56fff01 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
[..]
>  static int acpi_nfit_blk_single_io(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk,
> @@ -1078,11 +1078,16 @@ static int acpi_nfit_blk_single_io(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk,
>                 }
>
>                 if (rw)
> -                       memcpy_to_pmem(mmio->aperture + offset,
> +                       memcpy_to_pmem(mmio->addr.aperture + offset,
>                                         iobuf + copied, c);
> -               else
> +               else {
> +                       if (nfit_blk->dimm_flags & ND_BLK_READ_FLUSH)
> +                               mmio_flush_range((void __force *)
> +                                       mmio->addr.aperture + offset, c);
> +
>                         memcpy_from_pmem(iobuf + copied,
> -                                       mmio->aperture + offset, c);
> +                                       mmio->addr.aperture + offset, c);
> +               }

Why is the flush inside the "while (len)" loop?  I think it should be
done immediately after the call to write_blk_ctl() since that is the
point at which the aperture becomes invalidated, and not prior to each
read within a given aperture position.  Taking it a bit further, we
may be writing the same address into the control register as was there
previously so we wouldn't need to flush in that case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/