[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440052973.31419.191.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:42:53 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Subodh Nijsure <snijsure@...d-net.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Brad Mouring <brad.mouring@...com>,
Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubifs: Remove dead xattr code
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 10:48 +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 04:35 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > This is a partial revert of commit
> > d7f0b70d30ffb9bbe6b8a3e1035cf0b79965ef53
> > ("UBIFS: Add security.* XATTR support for the UBIFS").
>
> Hi Richard,
> What about a full reverting of this commit. In ubifs, we
> *can* support any namespace of xattr including user, trusted,
> security
> or other anyone prefixed by any words. But we have a
> check_namespace()
> in xattr.c to limit what we want to support. That said, if we want to
> "Add security.* XATTR support for the UBIFS", what we need to do is
> just extending the check_namespace() to allow security namespace
> pass.
> And yes, check_namespace() have been supporting security namespace.
>
> So, IMHO, we do not depend on the generic mechanism at all, and we
> can
> fully revert this commit.
We just weren't careful enough.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists