[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440060446.3515.117.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:47:26 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, lizefan@...wei.com,
cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified
hierarchy
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 00:52 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hmmm... I think this discussion got pretty badly derailed at this
> point. If I'm not mistaken, you're talking about tens or a few
> hundred millisecs of latency per migration which no longer exists and
> won't ever come back and the discussion originally was about something
> like migrating thread for issuing several IO requests versus bouncing
> that to a dedicated issuer thread in that domain.
Yes, ms latencies ever coming back is the concern, whether that be due
to something akin to the old synchronize_rcu() horror.. or some handoff
of whatever to whomever.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists