[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <03D4BAC8-0D9D-44CF-8EA7-4B368F4C9336@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:58:50 +0800
From: yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [x86] copy_from{to}_user question
> On Aug 17, 2015, at 12:16, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:27:01AM +0800, yalin wang wrote:
>> i just want the x86 copy_from{to,in}_user() function have
>> the same behaviour as other platforms.
>
> Back to the original question from 2 mails ago:
>
> How else would we be able to use the same function in copy_to and
> copy_from variants?
>
>> and can disclose potential BUGs in kernel, if do like this.
>
> Back to my other question:
>
> Do you have any real life examples where you can trigger such bugs or is
> this only "potential"?
>
> IOW, what I *think* you're trying to do sounds to me like unnecessary
> complication with no apparent gain *at* *all*. So show me why you want
> to do it: code it up, trigger a bug and show me why your version is
> better. No "but but it might be a good idea", no "potentially maybe",
> none of that maybe stuff. Write it, send it with instructions how
> someone else can apply it and trigger the issue. Ok?
>
>
i will loop you in a patch mail, for kcore driver rely on x86 copy_to_user()
feature like this , but not true on other platforms .
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists