[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150820110004.GB4632@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:00:05 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jörn Engel <joern@...estorage.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mm: hugetlb: proc: add HugetlbPages field to
/proc/PID/status
On Thu 20-08-15 08:26:27, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> Currently there's no easy way to get per-process usage of hugetlb pages,
Is this really the case after your previous patch? You have both
HugetlbPages and KernelPageSize which should be sufficient no?
Reading a single file is, of course, easier but is it really worth the
additional code? I haven't really looked at the patch so I might be
missing something but what would be an advantage over reading
/proc/<pid>/smaps and extracting the information from there?
[...]
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 3 +++
> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 12 ++++++++++
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 1 +
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 7 ++++++
> kernel/fork.c | 3 +++
> mm/hugetlb.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/mmap.c | 1 +
> mm/rmap.c | 4 +++-
> 9 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[...]
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists