[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55D5BB9E.3020304@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:35:58 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"valentin.manea@...wei.com" <valentin.manea@...wei.com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"javier@...igon.com" <javier@...igon.com>,
"emmanuel.michel@...com" <emmanuel.michel@...com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"jean-michel.delorme@...com" <jean-michel.delorme@...com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] arm/arm64: add smccc ARCH32
On 08/19/2015 06:50 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:40:25AM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
>> Adds helpers to do SMC based on ARM SMC Calling Convention.
>> CONFIG_HAVE_SMCCC is enabled for architectures that may support
>> the SMC instruction. It's the responsibility of the caller to
>> know if the SMC instruction is supported by the platform.
>
> [...]
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..3ce7fe8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S
>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2015, Linaro Limited
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License Version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/linkage.h>
>> +
>> +#define SMC_PARAM_W0_OFFS 0
>> +#define SMC_PARAM_W2_OFFS 8
>> +#define SMC_PARAM_W4_OFFS 16
>> +#define SMC_PARAM_W6_OFFS 24
>> +
>> +/* void smccc_call32(struct smccc_param32 *param) */
>> +ENTRY(smccc_call32)
>> + stp x28, x30, [sp, #-16]!
>
> Why are you saving lr?
>
>> + mov x28, x0
>> + ldp w0, w1, [x28, #SMC_PARAM_W0_OFFS]
>> + ldp w2, w3, [x28, #SMC_PARAM_W2_OFFS]
>> + ldp w4, w5, [x28, #SMC_PARAM_W4_OFFS]
>> + ldp w6, w7, [x28, #SMC_PARAM_W6_OFFS]
>> + smc #0
>> + stp w0, w1, [x28, #SMC_PARAM_W0_OFFS]
>> + stp w2, w3, [x28, #SMC_PARAM_W2_OFFS]
>> + ldp x28, x30, [sp], #16
>> + ret
>> +ENDPROC(smccc_call32)
>
> Could we deal with this like we do for PSCI instead? (see
> __invoke_psci_fn_smc). We could also then rename psci-call.S to fw-call.S
> and stick this in there too.
I think that make sense to make smc, hvc calling more generic. Remove
psci name from __invoke_psci_fn_smc and just use it in other drivers.
Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists