linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] arm: Adding support for atomic half word exchange

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <540319746.1862071440080751898.JavaMail.weblogic@ep2mlwas01b>
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:25:54 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Sarbojit Ganguly <ganguly.s@...sung.com>
To:	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Sarbojit Ganguly <ganguly.s@...sung.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	SHARAN ALLUR <sharan.allur@...sung.com>,
	VIKRAM MUPPARTHI <vikram.m@...sung.com>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Waiman.Long@...com" <Waiman.Long@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] arm: Adding support for atomic half word exchange

>> My apologies, the e-mail editor was not configured properly.
>> CC'ed to relevant maintainers and reposting once again with proper formatting.
>> 
>> Since 16 bit half word exchange was not there and MCS based qspinlock 
>> by Waiman's xchg_tail() requires an atomic exchange on a half word, 
>> here is a small modification to __xchg() code to support the exchange.
>> ARMv6 and lower does not have support for LDREXH, so we need to make 
>> sure things do not break when we're compiling on ARMv6.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sarbojit Ganguly <ganguly.s@...sung.com>>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h 
>> b/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h index 1692a05..547101d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
>> @@ -50,6 +50,24 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size
>>                         : "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
>>                         : "memory", "cc");
>>                 break;
>> +#if !defined (CONFIG_CPU_V6)
>> +               /*
>> +                * Halfword exclusive exchange
>> +                * This is new implementation as qspinlock
>> +                * wants 16 bit atomic CAS.
>> +                * This is not supported on ARMv6.
>> +                */

>I don't think you need this comment. We don't use qspinlock on arch/arm/.

Yes, till date mainline ARM does not support but I've ported Qspinlock on ARM hence I think that comment
might be required.

>> +       case 2:
>> +               asm volatile("@ __xchg2\n"
>> +               "1:     ldrexh  %0, [%3]\n"
>> +               "       strexh  %1, %2, [%3]\n"
>> +               "       teq     %1, #0\n"
>> +               "       bne     1b"
>> +               : "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (tmp)
>> +               : "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
>> +               : "memory", "cc");
>> +               break;
>> +#endif
>>         case 4:
>>                 asm volatile("@ __xchg4\n"
>>                 "1:     ldrex   %0, [%3]\n"

>We have the same issue with the byte exclusives, so I think you need to extend the guard you're adding to cover that case too (which is a bug in current mainline).

Ok, I will work on this and release a v2 soon. 

>Will

- Sarbojit