[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150820163851.GG27457@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:38:51 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
wsa@...-dreams.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] eeprom: at24: extend driver to plug into the NVMEM
framework
> It's true that this is something that we might have overlooked. Is it
> expected to maintain that compatibility when moving a driver from one
> framework to another (and this is a real question, not a troll)?
Yes. There will be user space applications reading from the eeprom
file in /sys. In fact, until the NVMEM framework arrived, it was not
easy to access the eeprom from kernel space, meaning the majority of
users must of been user space...
> If so, we might provide a compatibility layer to add the former file
> too, protected by a kconfig option maybe ?
There is one other detail you might of missed. Both AT24 and AT25 do
have an in kernel API. In the at24_platform_data you can have a
callback function "setup" which gets called when the device is
probed. setup() is called with a struct memory_accessor which contains
function pointers for reading and writing to the EEPROM. A few
platforms use these for getting the MAC address out of the EEPROM.
And these platforms are old style, not DT.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists