lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150820210822.GH74600@google.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:08:22 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] spi: (RFC, don't apply) report OF style modalias
 when probing using DT

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:36:34AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:31AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
> > 
> > An SPI driver that supports both OF and legacy platforms, will have
> > both an OF and SPI ID table. This means that when built as a module,
> > the aliases will be filled from both tables, e.g:
> 
> This is tagged as something that can't be applied but you've not
> explained why it can't be applied or what comments might be useful :(

I believe that's mostly addressed in the cover letter [1].

  Patch #18 changes the logic of spi_uevent() to report an OF modalias
  if the device was registered using OF. But this patch is included in
  the series only as an RFC for illustration purposes since changing
  that without first applying all the other patches in this series, will
  break module autoloading for the drivers of devices registered using
  OF but that lacks an of_match_table. I'll repost patch #18 once all
  the patches in this series have landed.

IOW, it's labeled as such mostly for safety, since it has quite a few
distributed dependencies.

Brian

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/20/109
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ