lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150821063458.GC12451@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 14:34:58 +0800
From:	Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] jump_label: introduce
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_{TRUE,FALSE}_ARRAY macros

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:28:26AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > These are used to define a static_key_{true,false} array.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/jump_label.h | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h
> > index 7f653e8f6690..5c1d6a49dd6b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
> > @@ -267,6 +267,12 @@ struct static_key_false {
> >  #define DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(name)	\
> >  	struct static_key_false name = STATIC_KEY_FALSE_INIT
> >  
> > +#define DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE_ARRAY(name, n)	\
> > +	struct static_key_true name[n] = { [0 ... n - 1] = STATIC_KEY_TRUE_INIT }
> > +
> > +#define DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE_ARRAY(name, n)	\
> > +	struct static_key_false name[n] = { [0 ... n - 1] = STATIC_KEY_FALSE_INIT }
> 
> I think the define makes the code more obfuscated and less clear, the open-coded 
> initialization is pretty dense and easy to read to begin with.

OK, I will drop this patch and move the initialization of the array to the
corresponding patch.

Thanks,
Kevin

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ