linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] fbdev/riva:change to use generice function to implement reverse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55D6C812.6080400@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:41:22 +0300
From:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To:	yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>
CC:	<adaplas@...il.com>, <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] fbdev/riva:change to use generice function to implement
 reverse_order()



On 20/08/15 14:30, yalin wang wrote:
> 
>> On Aug 20, 2015, at 19:02, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/08/15 13:12, yalin wang wrote:
>>> This change to use swab32(bitrev32()) to implement reverse_order()
>>> function, have better performance on some platforms.
>>
>> Which platforms? Presuming you tested this, roughly how much better
>> performance? If you didn't, how do you know it's faster?
> 
> i investigate on arm64 platforms:

Ok. So is any arm64 platform actually using these devices? If these
devices are mostly used by 32bit x86 platforms, optimizing them for
arm64 doesn't make any sense.

Possibly the patches are still good for x86 also, but that needs to be
proven.

 Tomi


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)