[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150821082636.GK13546@localhost>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:56:36 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_OF vs DMA_OF
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 05:35:58AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Vinod
>
> ${LINUX}/drivers/dma/of-dma.c will be compiled if .config has DMA_OF
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_DMA_OF) += of-dma.o
>
> But, ${LINUX}/include/linux/of_dma.h is based on CONFIG_OF
Intially it was OF only and then DMA_OF was added. I think we missed it
during the move, so yes your below patch makes sense
Can you please send as formal patch for me to apply
--
~Vinod
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> extern int of_dma_controller_register(struct device_node *np,
> ...
> #else
> static inline int of_dma_controller_register(struct device_node *np,
> ...
> #endif
>
> I have issue if .config has CONFIG_OF but not have DMA_OF.
> Is this correct patch ?
>
> ---------------------------------
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_dma.h b/include/linux/of_dma.h
> index 98ba752..9440622 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_dma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_dma.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct of_dma_filter_info {
> dma_filter_fn filter_fn;
> };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +#ifdef DMA_OF
> extern int of_dma_controller_register(struct device_node *np,
> struct dma_chan *(*of_dma_xlate)
> (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *),
> ---------------------------------
>
>
> Best regards
> ---
> Kuninori Morimoto
--
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists