[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <55D67E99.60505@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:27:53 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: thomas.ab@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
heiko@...ech.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: soc: add support for exynos SROM driver
On 20.08.2015 20:34, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Sorry for delay in reply, as I got busy in some other official
> assignments and could not take this series further at that time.
>
> On Wednesday 27 May 2015 05:22 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> W dniu 29.04.2015 o 17:38, Pankaj Dubey pisze:
>>> This patch adds Exynos SROM controller driver which will handle
>>> save restore of SROM registers during S2R.
>>>
>>> Change-Id: Iaddaaebc1d7090c9889e948e68e886519562c43c
>>
>> Please remove it.
>
> Will do it.
>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 14 ++++
>>> drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-srom.c | 142
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-srom.h | 51 ++++++++++++++
>>> 6 files changed, 210 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-srom.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-srom.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/Kconfig
>>> index 76d6bd4..c3abfbe 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/Kconfig
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>>> menu "SOC (System On Chip) specific Drivers"
>>>
>>> source "drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig"
>>> +source "drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig"
>>> source "drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig"
>>> source "drivers/soc/versatile/Kconfig"
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Makefile b/drivers/soc/Makefile
>>> index 063113d..620366f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/Makefile
>>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>> #
>>>
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += qcom/
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMSUNG) += samsung/
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA) += tegra/
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_TI) += ti/
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_PLAT_VERSATILE) += versatile/
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..b6fa4e6
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>>> +#
>>> +# SAMSUNG SoC drivers
>>> +#
>>> +menu "Samsung SOC driver support"
>>> +
>>> +config SOC_SAMSUNG
>>> + bool
>>
>> Any reason for not using menuconfig?
>>
>
> For one of my Exynos PMU patchset [1] this suggestion came from Russel
> King, not to use user-visible sysmbol if not required.
> [1]:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304451.html
Okay, thanks. I'm fine with that.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists