linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 9/9] f2fs: update extent tree in batches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 20:54:44 +0800
From:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To:	'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/9] f2fs: update extent tree in batches

Hi Jaegeuk,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 1:48 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] f2fs: update extent tree in batches
> 
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:21:48PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > This patch introduce a new helper f2fs_update_extent_tree_range
> > which can update extent nodes in extent tree in batches.
> >
> > Now, we use the function to invalidate blocks in batches instead of
> > invalidating them one by one when truncating blocks.
> 
> IMO, it's not clear the benefit of this patch in terms of performance and code
> readability versus risky code changes.

This is only used in truncate path, IMO, in theory, we can gain benefit from
this batch mode operation when truncating frequently.

I will test the patch for numbers.

Thanks,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/