[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55D72A7C.1020101@fau.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:41:16 +0200
From: Andreas Ruprecht <andreas.ruprecht@....de>
To: Jianwei Wang <jianwei.wang.chn@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Xiubo Li <lixiubo@...s.chinamobile.com>,
Alison Wang <b18965@...escale.com>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
Stefan Hengelein <stefan.hengelein@....de>
Subject: Re: drm/layerscape: Add Freescale DCU DRM driver
Hi Jianwei,
your commit 109eee2f2a18 ("drm/layerscape: Add Freescale DCU DRM
driver") showed up in linux-next today (i.e., next-20150821). I noticed
it because we are running a daily analysis on the newest linux-next tree
as part of our research.
In the source code of fsl_dcu_drm_drv.c, there is the following #ifdef:
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
.compat_ioctl = drm_compat_ioctl,
#endif
The Kconfig option for the driver, however, states that the driver can
only be built with CONFIG_ARM enabled:
config DRM_FSL_DCU
tristate "DRM Support for Freescale DCU"
depends on DRM && OF && ARM
[...]
Inside arch/arm/, however, there is no definition of CONFIG_COMPAT (note
that there is one in arch/arm64/, but the driver explicitely needs
CONFIG_ARM), so the #ifdef block above can never be compiled in the
current state. Is this intended?
Regards,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists