[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150821204201.GD8193@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 22:42:01 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v6 05/36] leds: Improve setting brightness in a non
sleeping way
> This work queue from led-class.c is used for setting brightness, when
> blink timer is on. Blinking is the functionality from the LED core,
> so the work queue should also belong to the core. It should be moved
> there along with led_timer_function, for consistency reasons. In view
> of the above, using it for setting brightness by blocking drivers
> would be correct from the architectural point of view.
So lets assume we are not doing all the changes in a single patch
set. Its too complex. You say the work queue should be in the
core. Lets put a work queue in the core to handle the blocking op, and
strip it out of the drivers. That allows you to get a lot of driver
patches merged.
You can then work on moving led_timer_function into the core, etc,
with a much smaller patch set, and hopefully in a number of small
steps which are easy to review.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists