[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150822040258.GA1605@katana>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 06:02:59 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>
Cc: "mpa@...gutronix.de" <mpa@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"Tirdea, Irina" <irina.tirdea@...el.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] iio: gyro: bmg160: optimize i2c transfers in
trigger handler
> > > The series[1] I am working on implements a i2c smbus block data
> > > regmap
> > > bus driver. Regmap should then automatically do a block read in
> > > regmap_bulk_read.
> >
> > Hmm, so doesn't your series make Irina's series obsolete? It
> > addresses
> > the same problem only at a different layer (i2c core vs. regmap), or?
> > It
> > would mean that i2c client drivers which want to support byte, word,
> > or
> > block transfers should be converted to regmap. I assume most of the
> > potential candidates are register based devices anyhow. Then, regmap
> > would be the proper abstraction layer. Have I overlooked something?
> >
> This is the only driver converted to use regmap, because of SPI mode
> support. The other drivers will still use Irina's changes.
The question is if they should. Or rather be converted to regmap. It is
an open question and I am seeking for further input.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists