[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150822100922.GA25039@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:09:22 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
David Keitel <dkeitel@...eaurora.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
Yury <yury.norov@...il.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/KASAN updates for 4.3
* Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:24:28PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:02:26PM +0100, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> > > 2015-08-13 12:01 GMT+03:00 Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>:
> > > > Yes please, works for me! If we're targetting 4.3, then please can you base
> > > > on 4.2-rc4, as that's what our current arm64 queue is using?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Does this mean that we are targeting arm64 part for 4.3 too?
> >
> > It depends on how well it merges with our current queue and whether it
> > holds up to regression testing. The patches have been reviewed, so I'm
> > comfortable with the content, but we're not at a stage where we can debug
> > and fix any failures that might crop up from the merge.
>
> Scratch that :(
>
> I tried this out under EFI and it dies horribly in the stub code because
> we're missing at least one KASAN_SANITIZE_ Makefile entry.
>
> So I think this needs longer to stew before hitting mainline. By all means
> get the x86 dependencies in for 4.3, but the arm64 port can probably use
> another cycle to iron out the bugs.
Is there any known problem with the two patches in this series, or can I apply
them?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists