[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150823153148.GB3935@Sanchayan-Arch>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:01:48 +0530
From: maitysanchayan@...il.com
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] touchscreen: colibri-vf50-ts: Add touchscreen
support for Colibri VF50
On 15-08-22 18:52:28, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Hi Sanchayan,
>
> On 2015-08-21 06:26, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> > +static int vf50_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct input_dev *input;
> > + struct iio_channel *channels;
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct vf50_touch_device *touchdev;
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + channels = iio_channel_get_all(dev);
> > + if (IS_ERR(channels))
> > + return PTR_ERR(channels);
>
> Hm, we expect here that four channels are returned, however a faulty
> device tree could contain less. Access to the fourth channel above would
> lead to a bug.
>
> Can you check the amount of channels returned? The returned list is
> explicitly terminated with a null entry, you can rely on that. Something
> similar to hwmon should do the job.
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c#L86
I agree. It did be nice to have this error check. Thanks. I will add
this check so we can bail out if less channels are specified.
- Sanchayan.
>
>
> Otherwise, Acked-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
>
> --
> Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists