[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440400997.3430.12.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:23:17 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vatika Harlalka <vatikaharlalka@...il.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] sched/nohz: Affine unpinned timers to
housekeepers
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 08:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the 'housekeeping CPU' is essentially the boot CPU. Yet we dedicate a full mask to
> it (housekeeping_mask - a variable mask to begin with) and recover the
> housekeeping CPU via:
>
> + return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_mask, cpu_online_mask);
There can be, and had better be if box is big, multiple housekeepers.
Imagine a NO_HZ_FULL_ALL kernel on an SGI beast from hell. Offloading
8191 CPUs onto poor little CPU0 probably wouldn't work out well :)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists