[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440402888.3430.18.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:54:48 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vatika Harlalka <vatikaharlalka@...il.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] sched/nohz: Affine unpinned timers to
housekeepers
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 09:41 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 08:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > the 'housekeeping CPU' is essentially the boot CPU. Yet we dedicate a full mask to
> > > it (housekeeping_mask - a variable mask to begin with) and recover the
> > > housekeeping CPU via:
> > >
> > > + return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_mask, cpu_online_mask);
> >
> > There can be, and had better be if box is big, multiple housekeepers.
>
> Yes - but that does not seem to be possible via the code right now AFAICS, so at
> minimum it's incomplete.
In master housekeepers are set up in tick_nohz_init(). Everybody who's
not a nohz_full CPU is a housekeeper.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists