[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04EAB7311EE43145B2D3536183D1A8445493D025@GSjpTKYDCembx31.service.hitachi.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 01:52:26 +0000
From: 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
<hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
To: "'minyard@....org'" <minyard@....org>
CC: "openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 7/7] ipmi/kcs: Don't run the KCS state machine when it
is KCS_IDLE
> From: Corey Minyard [mailto:tcminyard@...il.com] On Behalf Of Corey Minyard
>
> On 08/17/2015 09:54 PM, 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO wrote:
> >> From: Corey Minyard [mailto:tcminyard@...il.com] On Behalf Of Corey Minyard
> >>
> >> This patch will break ATN handling on the interfaces. So we can't do this.
> > I understand. So how about doing like this:
> >
> > /* All states wait for ibf, so just do it here. */
> > - if (!check_ibf(kcs, status, time))
> > + if (kcs->state != KCS_IDLE && !check_ibf(kcs, status, time))
> > return SI_SM_CALL_WITH_DELAY;
> >
> > I think it is not necessary to wait IBF when the state is IDLE.
> > In this way, we can also handle the ATN case.
>
> I think it would be more reliable to go up a level and add a timeout.
It may be so, but we should address this issue separately (at least
I think above solution reasonably solves the issue).
This issue happens after all queued messages are processed or dropped
by timeout. There is no current message. So what should we set
a timeout against? We can add a timeout into my new flush_messages(),
but that is meaningful only in panic context. That doesn't help
in normal context; we would perform a busy loop of smi_event_handler()
and schedule() in ipmi_thread().
Regards,
Hidehiro Kawai
> One should
> be there, anyway. I thought they were all covered, but I may have missed
> something.
>
> -corey
>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hidehiro Kawai
> > Hitachi, Ltd. Research & Development Group
> >
> >> It's going to be extremely hard to recover if the BMC is not working
> >> correctly when a panic happens. I'm not sure what can be done, but if
> >> you can fix it another way it would be good.
> >>
> >> -corey
> >>
> >> On 07/27/2015 12:55 AM, Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
> >>> If a BMC is unresponsive for some reason, it ends up completing
> >>> the requested message as an error, then kcs_event() is called once
> >>> to advance the state machine. However, since the BMC is
> >>> unresponsive now, the status of the KCS interface may not be
> >>> idle. As the result, the state machine can continue to run and
> >>> comsume CPU time indefinitely even if there is no more request
> >>> message. Moreover, if this happens in run-to-completion mode
> >>> (i.e. context of panic_event()), the kernel hangs up.
> >>>
> >>> To fix this problem, this patch ignores kcs_event() call if there
> >>> is no request message to be processed.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_kcs_sm.c | 4 ++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_kcs_sm.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_kcs_sm.c
> >>> index 8c25f59..0e187fb 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_kcs_sm.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_kcs_sm.c
> >>> @@ -353,6 +353,10 @@ static enum si_sm_result kcs_event(struct si_sm_data *kcs, long time)
> >>> if (kcs_debug & KCS_DEBUG_STATES)
> >>> printk(KERN_DEBUG "KCS: State = %d, %x\n", kcs->state, status);
> >>>
> >>> + /* We don't want to run the state machine when the state is IDLE */
> >>> + if (kcs->state == KCS_IDLE)
> >>> + return SI_SM_IDLE;
> >>> +
> >>> /* All states wait for ibf, so just do it here. */
> >>> if (!check_ibf(kcs, status, time))
> >>> return SI_SM_CALL_WITH_DELAY;
> >>>
> >>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists