[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150824124924.GZ7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:49:24 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, ben@...adent.org.uk,
zajec5@...il.com, nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, juhosg@...nwrt.org, broonie@...nel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, galak@...eaurora.org,
shijie.huang@...el.com, computersforpeace@...il.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
beanhuo@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v4 5/5] mtd: atmel-quadspi: add driver for
Atmel QSPI controller
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:03:51PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> These are functions, not macros :)
>
> btw is there any reason for these ? I'd say, just put the read*() and
> write*() functions directly into the code and be done with it, it is
> much less confusing.
>
> Also, why do you use the _relaxed() versions of the functions ?
Now that the _relaxed() accessors are available throughout the kernel,
everyone should be using the _relaxed() versions unless they need the
properties of the non-relaxed versions. Remember that the non-relaxed
versions are rather expensive on ARM due to the need to go all the way
out to the L2 cache - it at least doubles the number of accesses for
every read*/write*().
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists